15 Youth Sue Canada Over Climate Inaction — SkimNews
Get the Energy newsletter
Daily energy & climate — solar, EVs, oil, the policy fights and tech bets shaping the transition. Free.
- 15 Canadian youth are suing the federal government in a constitutional climate case, arguing that inadequate emissions reductions violate their rights under Sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- La Rose v. His Majesty the King is set for a five-week trial in Vancouver, marking a rare instance of climate change being litigated in court, with all plaintiffs expected to testify alongside scientific experts
- Our Children’s Trust is backing the lawsuit, part of a global strategy to use courts to compel climate action, with its deputy director Kelly Matheson calling the trial a pivotal moment for youth voices
- Federal Court of Appeal allowed Section 7 claims to proceed in 2023 after narrowing the case, requiring plaintiffs to focus on specific government actions like the Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act and the 2030 emissions reduction plan
- Environment and Climate Change Canada declined an interview but stated in writing that the government remains committed to net-zero by 2050 and respects the judicial process
- James May, an environmental law professor, noted that while most of the 3,000+ global climate cases never reach trial, this one could serve as a blueprint even if the plaintiffs lose
Why it matters: The trial forces a direct legal reckoning with climate inaction, naming specific federal policies as rights-violating. If successful, it could compel stronger emissions targets and influence similar cases in common law countries, where courts are already watching outcomes like Held v. Montana.
Ask SkimNews
