Top journal’s special issue on women’s health casts spotlight on menopause and pain — SkimNews
Get the Health newsletter
Daily health & science — research, biotech, public health, the studies worth knowing. Free.
- Science published a special women's health issue Thursday edited by an all-female team — Yevgeniya Nusinovich, Sacha Vignieri, Joana Osório, and Sarah Ross — who named political attacks on women's rights and healthcare plus research funding cuts as urgent motives.
- The issue includes a review finding that women experience functional pain at roughly twice the rate of men, pinpointing sex hormones, immune-neural interactions, the gut microbiome, and ovarian hormones as key mechanisms while documenting how female pain remains understudied.
- The editors called for rethinking menopause research with individualized treatment approaches, and dedicated reviews to XX vs. XY chromosome impacts on aging and to the immune system's role in preparing for and sustaining pregnancy.
- Menopause advocate Omisade Burney-Scott praised the coverage but flagged what the issue omits: early menopause induced by gender-affirming care and how systemic oppression — racism, classism, homophobia, transphobia — shapes menopause health outcomes.
- Wake Forest's Tiarney Ritchwood argued the issue's reach is limited without dedicated funding and broader public dissemination beyond academic journals, while Paula Schneider of the Institute Advancing Women's Health said existing evidence on midlife health too often fails to reach clinical practice.
Why it matters: A journal of Science's stature dedicating an entire issue signals to the broader research community that women's health — particularly post-reproductive conditions and pain — is ripe for sustained investment. But the editors and outside experts stress that without restored funding and translation into clinical practice, the knowledge gain won't change outcomes for the women waiting for answers.
Ask SkimNews
