ICC Judges Sue Trump Over 'Unlawful' Sanctions
Get the Geopolitics newsletter
Daily geopolitics — wars, elections, sanctions, the diplomatic moves that move markets. Free.
- Three ICC judges — Kimberly Prost (Canada), Solomy Balungi Bossa (Uganda), and Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini-Gansou (Benin) — filed suit against Trump and his administration in Manhattan federal court on Wednesday over sanctions imposed last year.
- The judges argue the sanctions were designed to "punish and coerce" them regarding ICC decisions on US and Israeli war crimes cases, amounting to "extra-judicial pressure" on the bench.
- The Trump administration imposed the sanctions in retaliation for the ICC's arrest warrant for Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu and its prior decision to investigate alleged war crimes by US troops in Afghanistan.
- The sanctions blocked the judges' US-based property and assets and barred US entities from engaging in transactions with them, including through the "provision of funds, goods or services."
- The lawsuit contends the sanctions exceeded the scope of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and were not based on a genuine national emergency or extraordinary threat.
- The judges describe the measures as a "financial death penalty," saying they can no longer use credit cards, access banking services, use platforms like Amazon and Google, book travel, or in some cases obtain health insurance.
- The sanctions also bar the judges from submitting evidence and argument in any pending or future proceedings before them, directly interfering with their judicial functions.
Why it matters: Three sitting ICC judges from three continents are directly challenging the legal foundation of Trump's sanctions regime, arguing it exceeds the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and amounts to a "financial death penalty." The lawsuit puts a US federal court in the position of adjudicating measures targeting an international tribunal the US itself does not recognize.
Ask SkimNews
