Book profits or stay invested at market highs? Historical data may settle the debate
Get the Finance newsletter
Daily finance — markets, central banks, M&A, the prints that move money. Free.
- Nifty 50 TRI delivered annualized returns of 6.7% to 20.1% for buy-and-hold investors across 17 rolling 10-year periods from 2000-2009 to 2016-2025, per a FundsIndia Wealth Conversations analysis.
- Buy-and-hold outperformed four systematic profit-booking strategies that moved gains into the HDFC Money Market Fund, with the largest gaps appearing in the 2001-2010 period (19.1% annualized vs 14-14.6% for 20%/30%/50% profit-booking approaches).
- Selling at all-time highs — a common investor instinct — cost 2.9 to 5.4 percentage points of annual returns versus staying invested across four separate 10-year windows (2001-2010, 2003-2012, 2012-2021, 2016-2025).
- Two exceptions broke the pattern: during 2006-2015 and 2007-2016, buy-and-hold marginally underperformed some profit-booking strategies by 0.2 to 1.7 percentage points annually — periods that both spanned the 2008 financial crisis.
- Indian benchmarks opened sharply higher Monday, with the Nifty 50 up 1.53% to 23,984.85 and the Sensex up 1.59% to 76,725.27, on optimism over a US-Iran peace deal and easing crude prices that pushed WTI to around $80 a barrel.
Why it matters: Long-term investors who systematically booked profits and moved gains to the HDFC Money Market Fund gave up 2.9 to 5.4 percentage points of annual returns compared to buy-and-hold, the study found. The two periods where profit-booking edged ahead (2006-2015, 2007-2016) both covered the 2008 crash, suggesting booking gains can pay off when markets take a decade to recover.
Ask SkimNews
