More Debt Cuts Portfolio Drawdowns But Lowers Returns: FundsIndia — SkimNews
Get the Finance newsletter
Daily finance — markets, central banks, M&A, the prints that move money. Free.
- FundsIndia compared three equity-debt portfolios across rolling seven-year periods using Nifty 50 TRI, S&P 500 total returns, gold and a basket of low-duration and corporate bond funds, rebalanced annually within a 5% band.
- A 70% equity / 30% debt portfolio delivered a 13.8% average annualised return but suffered a 40% maximum drawdown, the largest fall among the three combinations tested.
- Shifting to 50% equity / 50% debt cut the average return to 12.5% and reduced the maximum drawdown to 27%.
- A 30% equity / 70% debt portfolio further lowered the average return to 10.7% but shrank the maximum drawdown to just 14%.
- Adding gold to the mix, a 70:15:15 equity-debt-gold portfolio saw 92% of rolling seven-year periods deliver annualised returns above 10%, while the more conservative 30:35:35 portfolio limited its maximum drawdown to 17%.
- The analysis underscores that historical results are not a guarantee of future returns, and the right allocation depends on an investor's ability to stomach declines without abandoning the strategy.
- The report's core takeaway, echoed in the article: investors who cannot tolerate a 30-40% portfolio decline may prefer less equity, while those with longer horizons and higher volatility tolerance can hold more.
Why it matters: For retail investors in India choosing between equity-heavy and debt-heavy portfolios, the FundsIndia data quantifies a real cost: trimming equity from 70% to 30% costs roughly 3.1 percentage points of average annual return (13.8% to 10.7%) but caps drawdowns at 14% instead of 40%. Adding gold provides a middle path, with the 30:35:35 mix delivering only a 17% drawdown — a 23-point improvement over the 70:15:15 portfolio's worst historical fall.
Ask SkimNews
