Analysts: US-Iran War Headed for Frozen Conflict
SkimNews Take
The renewed Hormuz shutdown and fragile truce indicate that regional actors are leveraging their limited power to create localized disruptions, effectively shifting the burden of escalation onto their rivals without direct confrontation.
Get the Geopolitics newsletter
Daily geopolitics — wars, elections, sanctions, the diplomatic moves that move markets. Free.
- Donald Trump treats ceasefires as the end of wars rather than pauses for substantive negotiations, and has claimed credit for ending ten conflicts, including the current Iran situation and Israel's war in Lebanon, even as underlying issues remain unresolved.
- Trump walked away from the India-Pakistan and Thailand-Cambodia conflicts after ceasefires held, leaving frozen standoffs and continued risk of renewed hostilities, a pattern the authors expect to repeat with Iran.
- The US-Iran war is asymmetric, with Iran — the weaker actor — using tactics like closing the Strait of Hormuz and targeting Gulf state infrastructure to apply political, economic and psychological pressure rather than win a conventional battle.
- Iran agreed to the current ceasefire for survival, not as a commitment to lasting peace, a dynamic the authors compare to the Taliban's 20-year frozen conflict with the US in Afghanistan before the American withdrawal.
- Peace talks in Pakistan on April 11–12 collapsed because Iran refused to compromise on its nuclear program, a dispute the authors note took 20 months to negotiate into the 2015 JCPOA, which Trump withdrew from three years later calling it a "horrible one-sided deal."
- The Gaza ceasefire under Trump's 20-point plan illustrates the same trap: the first phase was implemented with hostage exchanges and reduced bombardments, but disputes over post-war governance and Hamas disarmament remain stuck, with Israel refusing full troop withdrawal.
Why it matters: Iran agreed to a ceasefire for survival as the weaker party, not for peace, and the nuclear question that derailed the April 11–12 Pakistan talks has no clear resolution path — meaning the region faces periodic flare-ups, a possible Middle East arms race, and recurring instability around the Strait of Hormuz rather than a genuine settlement.
