Fifa hydration breaks bring no extra revenue: Infantino
Get the Sports newsletter
Daily sports — scores, transfers, the storylines from the leagues you actually follow. Free.
- Fifa president Gianni Infantino said hydration breaks at the World Cup bring "no additional revenue for Fifa" and are "purely a sporting matter," noting all commercial agreements were signed well in advance
- Three-minute pauses midway through both halves of every World Cup fixture were introduced to help players cope with extreme heat during the tournament in North America
- Infantino framed the universal application of breaks as creating "equal conditions" for all competing nations — applied even in matches like England's draw with Ghana on Tuesday, played in more comfortable temperatures, and inside air-conditioned stadiums
- BBC Sport experts estimated a 30-second World Cup advertising slot on Fox Sports costs between $200,000 (£152,000) and $300,000 (£227,000), rising to $750,000 (£567,000) during USA matches and final stages
- Television broadcasters in several countries aired adverts during hydration breaks — though not in the UK — with US ad revenue from the breaks alone projected to exceed $250m (£189m)
- Managers and coaching staff are permitted to discuss tactics with players during the three-minute pauses, adding a competitive-strategic dimension to a policy framed around player welfare
- Players, coaches and supporters gave mixed reactions, with some sections of fans booing when referees signaled the breaks
Why it matters: Infantino's denial is narrowly about FIFA's own books — pre-signed commercial deals mean the governing body captures nothing incremental. But the data he was responding to shows broadcasters, not FIFA, are the financial beneficiaries: US ad revenue from hydration breaks alone is projected to exceed $250m, meaning television networks capture essentially all the monetary upside of a policy FIFA presents as purely about player welfare and competitive fairness.
Ask SkimNews
