The Guardian view on the Nepal-Tibet floods: a spur to action on climate | Editorial — SkimNews
Get the Energy newsletter
Daily energy & climate — solar, EVs, oil, the policy fights and tech bets shaping the transition. Free.
- Nepal is still reeling from a glacier collapse on the Nepal-Tibet border three weeks ago, with at least 1,300 killed and more than 5,000 missing — some trapped in tunnels linked to 13 damaged hydropower plants, with four bodies recovered from one tunnel on Wednesday.
- Nepal's foreign minister Shisir Khanal said last week the country will request $20m (£15m) from the UN loss and damage fund toward an estimated $5bn (£3.75bn) rebuilding cost, including replacement of up to 20,000 homes.
- Imperial College London scientists working with the World Weather Attribution project concluded that atmospheric heating and fossil fuel pollution worsened the drivers of the glacier fall — the first academic study linking the disaster to the climate crisis, and now part of Nepal's funding application.
- Nepal accounts for less than 0.1% of global greenhouse gas emissions, yet is bearing the brunt of climate impacts driven by decisions made elsewhere.
- The UN loss and damage fund, currently estimated at just $400m (£300m), has received claims totaling nearly $3bn (£2.2bn) from roughly 120 countries — a shortfall the Guardian partly attributes to Donald Trump withdrawing the US from the Paris climate agreement and pressuring the World Bank to drop its climate finance goals.
- Turkey, host of the next climate summit in November, has positioned itself as a champion for developing countries, with the editorial urging that boosting the loss and damage fund be prioritized if climate justice is to remain credible.
Why it matters: Nepal contributes under 0.1% of global greenhouse gas emissions yet is asking a $400m UN fund — already facing $3bn in claims from 120 countries — to help cover a $5bn rebuilding bill. The November Turkey climate summit is the next pressure point, and the editorial argues climate justice depends on donors matching rhetoric with cash.
Ask SkimNews
