Flexibility Works. Scaling It Is a Customer Problem
Get the Energy newsletter
Daily energy & climate — solar, EVs, oil, the policy fights and tech bets shaping the transition. Free.
- The flexibility industry has spent roughly a decade running pilots and papers to prove that shifting, storing, and orchestrating flexible load works, with large-scale deployments across multiple utility territories already demonstrating the technology is mature.
- Growing electricity demand from data centers, electrification, and AI-driven load is now a recurring theme in integrated resource plans, earnings calls, and industry conferences, while the tools to meet it — proven flexibility — sit underused.
- Many flexibility programs still operate with pilot-era mechanics: separate thermostat and battery programs, each with its own team, sign-up flow, and customer touchpoint, which the essay argues is a poor fit for the millions of coordinated devices utilities now need.
- Industry investment has gone heavily into forecasting, dispatch, and verification, but far less into the customer-facing front end — the sign-up flow, app experience, and post-enrollment engagement that determine whether enrolled customers actually stick around.
- A sign-up flow that converts 18% instead of 12% can determine whether a program delivers enough flexible capacity to defer infrastructure investment, and customers who stay engaged season after season become dependable capacity utilities can plan around, per the essay.
- Utilities making the fastest progress treat customer participation as core infrastructure — single points of entry instead of disconnected sign-ups, and engagement that continues after enrollment rather than only at the moment of it.
- Octopus Energy is cited as having grown a customer-first approach into the world's largest virtual power plant, illustrating the scale the essay argues the rest of the industry must now pursue.
Why it matters: If flexibility programs can't convert and retain customers at scale, utilities lose a proven alternative to building new infrastructure to meet data center, electrification, and AI-driven load — and the essay frames a 6-percentage-point jump in sign-up conversion (18% vs 12%) as the difference between a program that defers grid investment and one that doesn't.
